The post Diversity in journalism first appeared on Media Helping Media.
]]>By diversity we are talking about a wide range of identities, including but not limited to race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, disability, socioeconomic background, and religion.
In an article on this site, Naomi Goldsmith wrote about the role of women in the media. In ‘Gender equality in the media’ she argued that “Gender equality is important for both men and women. Neither gender benefits from being stereotyped and not being allowed to fulfil its full potential.”
Gender is just one area covered by diversity. The following are some of the ethical, editorial and business reasons why diversity in both staffing and coverage is important:
Supporting information:
In conclusion, diversity in media is not just a matter of social justice; it is essential for producing accurate, fair, and engaging content that reflects the complexity of our world.
Diversity in journalism is crucial not only for fair representation but also for improving the quality and relevance of news coverage. It ensures that media content speaks to a broader audience, reflecting the complexity of the society it serves.
Diversity encompasses a wide range of identities, including race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, disability, socioeconomic background, and religion. By including these varied perspectives, journalism becomes more comprehensive, nuanced, and relatable.
One key area where diversity matters is in staffing. Journalists from different backgrounds bring unique experiences, cultural knowledge, and perspectives that enrich storytelling and lead to more authentic representation. This helps avoid stereotypical portrayals, particularly of marginalised groups, while providing greater depth and complexity in news coverage. A diverse newsroom is also better equipped to understand and report on communities often overlooked by traditional media.
Ensuring diversity in coverage is equally important. By reporting on a wide range of voices and experiences, media outlets shine a light on underrepresented communities and the issues that affect them. This approach not only promotes empathy and understanding but also helps counteract bias and challenge dominant narratives. A diverse editorial focus allows journalism to tackle complex social issues in a way that is fair, accurate, and informative.
Diversity also plays a critical role in building trust and credibility. Audiences are more likely to engage with a media organisation that reflects their realities and perspectives. When people see themselves accurately and respectfully portrayed, it strengthens their connection to the news and fosters a more inclusive media landscape. This is essential for maintaining public trust and supporting healthy democratic discourse.
Lastly, diversity enhances creativity and innovation within journalism. A wide range of voices in the newsroom leads to more dynamic storytelling, fresh ideas, and new ways of engaging audiences. Similarly, diverse coverage exposes audiences to different cultures, experiences, and viewpoints, enriching the overall media landscape.
In an increasingly diverse and global society, prioritising diversity in journalism is not just ethically important, it is vital for the industry’s relevance and survival.
The post Diversity in journalism first appeared on Media Helping Media.
]]>The post Lesson: Gender Equality first appeared on Media Helping Media.
]]>Students will critically analyse media content to identify gender stereotypes and evaluate strategies for promoting gender equality. They will apply these strategies to create a media piece that challenges existing stereotypes and supports gender equality.
Think, Pair, Share: Guide students through a structured analysis of a media piece to identify gender stereotypes and biases.
Circulate to observe and support students as needed.
Ask students to answer these questions:
Here are some suggested answers:
The free teaching tools at the Khan Academy were used as a basis for converting the original article into a lesson plan.
The post Lesson: Gender Equality first appeared on Media Helping Media.
]]>The post Female representation in news leadership and coverage first appeared on Media Helping Media.
]]>Is your news organisation and its output male dominated? Are women fairly represented in newsroom leadership roles and the stories covered? Do your staff and your news agenda reflect the society they serve?
A 12-point plan containing “substantive opportunities to reshape the status quo” and improve the representation and voices of women in the global news industry was published in November 2022.
We look at the steps suggested and examine the possible consequences.
The report Outrage to Opportunity looks at the representation of women in newsrooms in India, Kenya, Nigeria, South Africa, the UK, and the USA.
Luba Kassova, the report’s author, says in-depth interviews with more than 40 senior editors in the six countries revealed two areas of concern:
Kassova’s research revealed a “cultural exclusion” of women in news leadership roles and found that the voices of women “remain muted in a global news industry”.
However the study also recognises that progress is being made. It looks at 168 existing initiatives which aim to improve women’s representation or inclusion in news.
And it identifies practical steps that could be taken to “include the missing perspectives of women of all colours in news leadership and coverage”.
The report says that taking these steps could open up significant business opportunities and that “global revenues in the newspaper industry would increase by a cumulative $11bn by 2027 and $38 billion by 2032“.
This article looks at those 12 practical steps that could be taken by news organisations. They are listed below with the author’s permission.
The 282-page document – embedded at the foot of this article – sets out three areas which the author says “requires the news industry’s urgent attention”.
The report found that women are still on the margins of editorial decision-making in the highest-profile news areas. In the major journalistic specialisms such as business, politics, and foreign affairs, women hold as few as one in six editorial roles in the countries researched. Occasional instances of parity, for example South African political editors or US business editors, are counterbalanced by exclusively male leadership in political editor roles in countries such as Kenya and India.
According to the report, women news leaders are subject to marginalisation in countries with multi-racial populations such as South Africa, the UK, and the US. This, the report says, is a news industry “blind spot”. In the countries examined their representation is significantly below their proportion in the working population. Kassova says that when interviewed, news leadership teams are either unaware, reactive, push back, or turn a blind eye to the problem.
The report says the coverage of issues that affect women is disproportionate. Just 0.02% of news coverage globally focuses on the gaps between men and women in pay, power, safety, authority, confidence, health, and ageism. According to the report:
“Just having women in many leadership positions is not the only solution. You need women’s voices to be heard, and, when women are in leadership positions, for them to be in meaningful positions.”
The report outlines 12 solutions for:
“changing the status quo and improving women’s representation and inclusion in news leadership and creating a more balanced and inclusive news coverage that engages more female and racially-diverse audiences”.
The report says gender equality in news makes business sense. It claims that if the “addressable gender consumption gap” in the global news industry is closed there could be a potential cumulative revenue opportunity of $43 billion between 2023 and 2027 and $83 billion between 2023 and 2032. See the section of the report covering business opportunities (part 4, chapter 2).
The entire 282-page report Outrage to Opportunity is embedded below.
The report was produced by the international audience strategy consultancy AKAS, and published by Internews.
This checklist appeared on pages 166 and 167 in the 2020 report by Luba Kassova “The Missing Perspectives of Women in News“. It is republished here with the author’s permission.
The post Female representation in news leadership and coverage first appeared on Media Helping Media.
]]>The post Gender equality in the media first appeared on Media Helping Media.
]]>The role of the journalist in rectifying gender imbalance in media is multifaceted, and it involves both individual actions and contributing to broader systemic change.
The number of women and men in the world is roughly equal according to data compiled in 2021. However women make up about a quarter of those heard, read about or seen in news output. And only one in five experts interviewed by journalists are women.
To find out why, and what can be done about it, we first need to consider the difference between gender and sex.
Sex refers to biological differences between men and women. Men produce sperm and women can become pregnant, bear children and breastfeed. These differences are permanent without surgery and medicine.
Gender refers to socially constructed differences between women and men. These differences are not biological and are therefore fluid. They vary between cultures, within cultures, and over time. This affects how we are seen and how we are expected to behave as men and women.
Media can play an important role in either promoting gender equality or perpetuating gender stereotypes.
Women make up half the population and therefore make up half the audience so it doesn’t make sense to pay them less attention. They make decisions on behalf of themselves, their families and their businesses or organisations. They also possess half the potential of the global population.
Women are customers. They buy goods and services for themselves. They are business owners and householders so they are attractive to advertisers and other businesses. It makes no financial sense to underestimate women in any media business plan.
But, despite this, the portrayal of women in the media is often far from accurate. The media needs to ensure it offers proportional and fair coverage of women rather than resorting to using outdated stereotypes.
According to UNESCO Institute for Statistics (2018) more than half of all scientists in Thailand are women. STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) subjects that have traditionally been seen as a male area of expertise and so this is an impressive achievement. However, a 2015 UNESCO study found that women are more likely to be depicted as victims, family members and sex objects in the media throughout Asia.
Journalists who use such stereotypes in their coverage are failing in one of the core values of journalism – accuracy.
Take a look at any mainstream media organisation and consider how women and girls are portrayed. Check how often women are interviewed as experts in their field. Assess how often women are portrayed as victims.
In children’s cartoons, films and stories observe how girls and boys are depicted and consider what influence this might have on children and their parents.
It is possible you will notice gender bias. This is why gender equality is important. Journalists and media organisations can address this.
When a speaker is needed for an opinion on an issue ensure that half those selected are women. To be an expert a person doesn’t necessarily need to have an academic qualification. Traditionally, women have carried out unpaid work but through that work they become experts in that field.
Media managers can ensure that recruitment is gender blind. They can ask someone in the organisation who is not connected with the selection process to present job applicant’s CVs and covering letters without reference to their gender or identities. This prevents candidates being judged unfairly by their names at the early stage. Some names are an indication of ethnicity or social background.
Human resources (HR) managers should ensure that there is a balance of genders in all sections of a media organisation, including technical roles, senior editorial positions, board members and owners. However there isn’t much HR can do about ownership
Women should be paid the same as men for performing similar duties. In some organisations women do similar work as men and yet are paid less. In 2017, the BBC was found to be paying the top rates of pay to twice as many male presenters as they were to their female presenters. The UK’s Equality and Human Rights Commission did not find any unlawful acts of pay discrimination but the corporation was told to have greater transparency and rebuild trust with women who work there. However, following some high-profile complaints of unfair pay between men and women, 700 female staff received pay rises.
Women can face additional pressures such as online harassment as a result of their media work. This can include threats of violence and sexual insults. Media managers need to be aware of this and work with both female and male staff to introduce safeguarding measures.
Introducing gender equality in a media workplace is not difficult. There are a number of simple questions journalists and media managers need to address.
In programme output, do women appear as knowledgeable and empowered or are they in passive roles as victims? Do they exist only in their relation to a man? Do the concerns and interests of women receive half the attention as those of men?
When the opinions of a business owner or farmer are needed for a story don’t always turn to a man. Similarly, a caregiver can be male.
Are the questions the same? Are female politicians, activists and experts asked different questions to the ones asked of men in these positions? When do you hear male interviewees being asked how they manage to cope with juggling a career with raising children?
Are men and women depicted according to their gender or for the story? Are male interviewees photographed or filmed in the same way as female interviewees?
Consider the language used in scripts and introductions. Use camera operator instead of cameraman or camerawoman. police officer instead of policeman or policewoman. Humankind instead of mankind. This puts the job or role ahead of the gender and prevents the lazy assumption that the job or role is carried out by a man.
Some languages are more gendered than others and often the default is that the masculine is predominant. For example, in Spanish – a male friend is amigo and a female friend is amiga, but a group of friends takes the masculine and is amigos. You might wonder if this difference has an impact on society’s attitude to gender. It is worth noting that languages are always evolving, just like our views of gender.
Gender equality is important for both men and women. Neither gender benefits from being stereotyped and not being allowed to fulfil its full potential.
All our communities benefit when individual differences are welcomed and everyone – regardless of their gender – can play a full role in their society and are not expected to fill certain predetermined roles.
Every media organisation needs to provide gender equality training for all staff, regardless of their gender. Such training needs to filter through every level of the organisation from senior managers to interns on work experience. It needs to be part of the core values of the organisation and the policy should be visible in everything that is produced.
By Naomi Goldsmith
Despite progress in many areas, the news industry continues to struggle with gender equality. Women remain underrepresented in newsrooms, particularly in leadership roles, and their voices are often marginalised in news coverage.
This imbalance has significant implications for the quality and diversity of information that shapes public discourse.
One of the most pressing issues is the lack of women in decision-making positions. Despite making up a significant portion of journalism graduates, women are still underrepresented in top editorial roles.
This disparity affects not only the career trajectories of female journalists but also the kinds of stories that are prioritised and how they are framed.
Even when women are present in newsrooms, their voices are often sidelined in news coverage. Studies have shown that female sources are quoted far less frequently than male sources, and women are often relegated to covering “soft” news topics such as lifestyle and entertainment, while men dominate coverage of politics, economics, and international affairs.
This gender imbalance in news has several consequences. It perpetuates harmful stereotypes, limits the diversity of perspectives, and ultimately undermines the credibility of news organisations.
When women’s voices are excluded or marginalised, important stories go untold, and the public is left with an incomplete understanding of the world.
However, there are reasons to be optimistic. In recent years, there has been a growing awareness of the need for greater gender equality in news.
Organisations such as the International Women’s Media Foundation and the Women’s Media Center are working to support female journalists and promote their work. There are also increasing calls for newsrooms to implement policies that promote diversity and inclusion.
The rise of digital media has created new opportunities for women to share their stories and perspectives. Independent news outlets and online platforms are providing spaces for women to report on issues that are often ignored by mainstream media.
Gender equality in news is not just a women’s issue – it is a matter of fairness, accuracy, and the pursuit of a more informed and just society.
If you are a trainer of journalists we have a free Lesson plan: Gender equality in the media which you are welcome to download and adapt for your own purposes.
The post Gender equality in the media first appeared on Media Helping Media.
]]>